1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 17.01.2019 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate ...

Ultimately, the court directed the Revenue to issue Form SVLDRS-4 within four weeks, reaffirming that the scheme’s purpose ...

The Bombay High Court recently addressed Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs Union of India, involving a customs notice issued ...

(i) All the police stations and the police out-posts in the State of Odisha must be fully equipped with aptly placed and duly ...

(a) In Direct tax Code 2025, there will be a probability that higher rate of tax is 35% as against in income tax i.e. 30% but due to surcharge that effective rate became 42.744%. Surcharge may be ...

22. Further the company and its officers are hereby direct that the penalty amount shall be remitted from their own sources ...

Penalty Reduced from Rs. 37,28,000 to Rs. 4,39,100 II. For Non-Appointment of Whole-Time Director: Penalty Reduced from Rs. 7 ...

1. Rule 8 of the CGST Rules, 2017 has been amended to provide that an applicant can be identified on the common portal, based ...

Held that the nature of the work performed, rather than the label assigned to the worker, should determine employment status and the corresponding rights and benefits. 1. Leave granted.

Conclusion: Assessment and penalty orders issued against assessee was set aside considering pathology reports of assessee as a valid reason for failing to respond to various income tax notices.

The assessee escalated the matter to ITAT Mumbai, arguing that she was denied the opportunity to substantiate her claims. The ITAT found merit in granting the appellant another chance to present her ...

Considering the opening cash balance of Rs.3,04,049/- available with the assessee and also the quantum of agricultural income ...